 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, June 13, 2006 |
 |
|


US military will not classify parts of new interrogation field manual, officials say
James M Yoch Jr on June 13, 2006 7:33 PM ET

[JURIST] The new US Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation [current text] will not contain a classified section, despite warnings from some in the Department of Defense [official website] that disclosing certain techniques would undermine the ability of interrogators to extract information, military officials said Tuesday. Interrogation techniques originally slated to be classified will be released publicly in the new manual or abandoned by the military. Defense officials considered classifying portions [JURIST report] of the manual to prevent enemy combatants from preparing for interrogations, but Congress resisted the idea, contending that it would cast doubt on US compliance with the Geneva Conventions [ICRC materials]. Last week, DOD officials said the manual would not include references [JURIST report] to Article 3 [text], the provision common to all four of the 1949 Conventions that bans "cruel treatment and torture" and "humiliating and degrading treatment" of detainees.
The Pentagon has been working on a new version of the manual since the prisoner abuse scandal at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] surfaced in 2004, but has struggled to come to an agreement [JURIST report] on revisions. Delays in releasing the manual have been attributed to attempts to legitimize different interrogation techniques and allow the Army to obtain timely intelligence from prisoners, while complying with the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 [JURIST document], which explicitly prohibits any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of persons in US custody. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former Atlanta mayor sentenced to over two years in prison for tax evasion
James M Yoch Jr on June 13, 2006 7:09 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Atlanta mayor Bill Campbell [Wikipedia profile] was sentenced to 2 1/2 years imprisonment Tuesday for three tax evasion charges on which he was convicted in March [JURIST report]. Judge Richard Story of the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia [official website] also ordered Campbell to pay $62,823 in unpaid taxes and $6,300 in fines. Campbell, who served as mayor from 1994 to 2002, was charged [DOJ indictment summary, PDF] in 2004 with taking bribes of more than $160,000 in exchange for city contracts during his administration. A jury acquitted him, however, of federal bribery and racketeering charges, prompting his attorneys to attack the tax evasion charges as an end-run around the other verdicts.
Campbell, who faced imprisonment up to nine years, was the focus of a seven-year investigation by the US Attorney's Office in Atlanta [official website] that resulted in convictions of 10 other city officials. AP has more. WSB-TV has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights commissioner to establish independent probe of East Timor violence
Joe Shaulis on June 13, 2006 2:28 PM ET

[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan [official website] told the UN Security Council [official website] Tuesday that he has asked the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights [official website] to establish an independent commission that will investigate the recent surge in violence [JURIST report] in East Timor [JURIST news archive]. "The sad events of recent weeks reflect shortcomings not only on the part of the Timorese leadership, but also on the part of the international community, in adequately sustaining Timor-Leste's nation-building process," Annan said [statement text], noting that the Timorese foreign affairs minister had requested the UN investigation. UN special envoy Ian Martin [official profile], who returned from the southeastern Asian republic last week, briefed the council on recommendations to quell the violence, including sustained international assistance to the Timorese police service.
At least 21 people in East Timor have been killed in clashes between soldiers and police [BBC report] in the past month. The UN sent more than 2,000 international peacekeepers to the Timorese capital of Dili, but that mission expired in May. Australia, which provided most of those peacekeepers, urged the Security Council on Tuesday to extend that mission and to create a new mission under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter [text]. "Given what has happened, we are now having to reassess our own presence on the ground," Annan told reporters [transcript; reported video] after leaving the Security Council meeting. Also on Tuesday, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees announced [statement] that the first phase of a relief operation was complete, with the arrival in Dili of 150 tons of supplies to house some 63,000 Timorese who have fled looting and violence. AFP has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Egypt parliament considers judicial reform bill
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 1:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The Egyptian Parliament [official website] has sent an anticipated judicial reform bill prepared by the Ministry of Justice back to Egypt's Cabinet to iron out controversial points, including the Justice Ministry's right to assess the performance of judges, the role of the Supreme Judiciary Council (SJC) in supervising judges, and government control over SJC appointments. Reformist judges have criticized the draft bill, saying it does not give them enough judicial independence and proclaiming they will continue to push for judicial freedom from government control. If the Cabinet fixes the points of contention in the draft bill, it will go to Egypt's upper level of parliament, the Shura Council, and the People's Assembly for approval. The Cabinet will meet Wednesday in an unusual session to approve the final text [AKI report].
The judicial reform bill comes in response to several protests organized primarily to support two judges who were put before a disciplinary panel [JURIST report] for revealing that some of their colleagues had allowed fraud [JURIST report] in last November's parliamentary elections. Hisham el-Bastawisi, one of the two judges put before the disciplinary panel, dismisses the draft bill as a ruse, saying "the government doesn't want judicial reform, or reform of any kind...They're just trying to fool us with this new draft law." IPS has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

AMA clarifies medical ethics standards for MDs supervising prisoner interrogations
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 1:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Medical Association [official website] has passed a measure clarifying its ethical guidelines [press release], which prohibit doctors from participating in torture or coercive interrogations. The AMA on Monday reiterated its contention that a doctor's duty is to heal a patient, and cannot take any part in prisoner interrogations. The AMA added that doctor-patient confidentiality still applies to detainees, and that doctors cannot participate in executions nor make a detainee well enough for execution. Dr. Priscilla Ray, chair of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs [official website], stated: Physicians must not conduct, directly participate in, or monitor an interrogation with an intent to intervene, because this undermines the physician's role as healer. Because it is justifiable for physicians to serve in roles that serve the public interest, the AMA policy permits physicians to develop general interrogation strategies that are not coercive, but are humane and respect the rights of individuals. The refined AMA guidelines, which have confused military doctors in the past, follow allegations that physicians or psychiatrists have helped in interrogations at the US detention centers at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archives], and serve to remove "ambiguity for physicians who must make decisions about their involvement in interrogations."
The US Department of Defense [official website] issued comprehensive guidelines [JURIST report; PDF text] last week for the treatment of detainees that direct doctors to force-feed detainees who endanger their own lives as a result of a hunger strike, sparking criticism from the AMA, the American Psychiatric Association and the World Medical Association [press releases]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Libya judge adjourns retrial of Bulgarian nurses for second time
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 11:48 AM ET

[JURIST] The Libyan retrial of five Bulgarian nurses [JURIST report] and one Palestinian doctor accused of infecting over 400 patients, primarily children, with the HIV virus, resumed Tuesday before presiding judge Mahmoud Haouissa adjourned until June 20, stating that the prosecution and defense both need additional time to prepare evidence and witness lists. Haouissa postponed the retrial once before [JURIST report] in May, saying the lawyers lacked the proper papers to go forth with the case. When the case resumes, the Libyan court will have one hearing per week to avoid tiring the defendants, who have been held in custody for seven years. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pressed the Libyan government [JURIST report] to release the captive nurses in April, saying, "this is a humanitarian case and it is time for them to come home."
The six medics were first convicted in May 2004 and sentenced to death [JURIST reports] for deliberately infecting the children, but the Libyan Supreme Court overturned the convictions [JURIST report] last December and ordered a retrial. Bulgaria and its allies, including the US and the European Union, contend the nurses are innocent and maintain that their confessions were coerced through torture. The six health workers, detained since 1999, previously argued that the children were infected with the disease prior to treatment by the accused. Nine police officers and one doctor were acquitted [JURIST report] of torturing the health workers [HRW report] last year. Reuters has more. The Bulgarian News Network has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge dismisses suit challenging 'In God We Trust' on US currency
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 11:01 AM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Frank Damrell of the US District Court for the Eastern District of California [official website] dismissed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] brought by atheist Michael Newdow [case website] against the US government, arguing that the words "In God We Trust" on US currency violate Newdow's rights under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. In his 18-page opinion [PDF text], Damrell rejected Newdow's argument that the 1977 US Supreme Court decision Wooley v. Maynard [text], a case that struck down a New Hampshire law requiring citizens to display license plates with the motto "live free or die" inscribed on them, supports his contention that citing God on US currency burdens his right to freely exercise his atheistic beliefs. Damrell noted that currency, unlike passenger vehicles, does not represent its operator and instead cited a 1970 ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website], Aronow v. United States, rendering "In God We Trust" a "patriotic or ceremonial character" with no government establishment or endorsement of religion.
Newdow plans to appeal the district court ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and said he is optimistic about his chances because he previously won a case [JURIST report] on behalf of his daughter in the Ninth Circuit where he argued that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance violates the Establishment Clause [Duke Law case backgrounder]. On appeal, however, the US Supreme Court dismissed the case [JURIST report], holding that Newdow lacked standing to bring the suit on behalf of his daughter. Reuters has more. The Sacramento Bee has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam judge cuts off defense witness testimony
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 9:58 AM ET

[JURIST] Judge Raouf Abdel-Rahman [BBC profile], the chief judge in the Saddam Hussein trial [JURIST news archive], told the courtroom Tuesday that this would be the last day the court would hear defense witnesses, fostering speculation that the trial will end soon. Abdel-Rahman cut off defense witnesses despite complaints by American defense lawyer Curtis Doebbler [Wikipedia profile] on Monday that the court is rushing the defense through their case [JURIST report], even though the prosecution had five months to present its case [JURIST report]. Doebbler also complained that the court ignored defense motions and intimidated defense witnesses. Last month, four defense witnesses were detained on perjury charges [JURIST report] after three alleged that some of the 148 Shiites that Hussein and his seven co-defendants are accused of executing are still alive, while a fourth witness claimed the prosecution bribed him to lie during testimony. All four witnesses recanted their testimony [JURIST report] late Monday, claiming they were coerced into testifying.
Abdel-Rahman also banned [Reuters report] Hussein's half brother and co-defendant Barzan al-Tikriti from the courtroom Tuesday, after throwing him out of court Monday. When the defense concludes its case, the prosecution and defense will present closing statements and the five-judge panel presiding over the trial at the Iraqi High Tribunal [official website] will adjourn to render a verdict. AP has more.
10:54 AM ET - At the close of Tuesday's hearing, Abdel-Rahman directed the prosecution to present closing arguments on Monday and scheduled defense closing arguments for July 10. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ACLU asks federal appeals court to compel CIA to turn over interrogation documents
Jaime Jansen on June 13, 2006 8:35 AM ET

[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union [advocacy website] on Monday asked the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] to force the US Central Intelligence Agency [official website] to turn over two documents relating to the CIA's overseas interrogation practices under the ACLU's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [text; DOJ materials] request. The ACLU wants the documents - a directive signed by President Bush giving the CIA authority to set up detention centers outside the US to interrogate prisoners and a Department of Justice [official website] memorandum outlining interrogation methods the CIA could use against al Qaeda members - in order to force the CIA to reveal how much authority it has been given to interrogate detainees since Sept. 11, 2001. The government, however, has refused to confirm or deny that the documents exist, even though the ACLU argues that confirming the documents exist would not jeopardize national security or reveal intelligence gathering methods. The Second Circuit heard arguments Monday to determine whether the documents fall outside of FOIA as the government argues, but the court first needs to determine if the documents exist and what they contain. The government believes that confirming the existence of the documents, which have allegedly been linked to media reports, will reveal how the CIA operates and threaten national security. A federal district court judge ruled [PDF text] in favor of the government last fall, prompting the ACLU to appeal [PDF text].
The panel of three judges seemed split on the government's argument, trying to determine whether the CIA refused to confirm or deny the existence of the documents because of national security, or to avoid political embarrassment as the ACLU alleged. Peter Skinner, the lawyer representing the government, seemed apologetic during his vague arguments, noting that he could not explain much of the government's argument because of classified information. Anemona Hartocollis of the New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|